Phillip Garrido is one of those rare individuals who has had this blood boiling effect on me. You may remember my post about Jaycee Lee Dugard and the couple who kidnapped her at age eleven and kept her as a sex slave for eighteen years. I called her accused kidnapper, Garrido, a monster, and I stand by that description. I yet withhold any opinion of his wife, who not only stood by her husband's side during the entire ordeal, but reportedly was the person who snatched Jaycee from the street, and is speculated to have delivered Jaycee's two babies - both allegedly fathered by the monster, himself. And now, it has come to light that Mr. Garrido was sent back to prison (or jail) for somewhere between six weeks and five months (depending on the source,) for parole violation, early in Jaycee's eighteen year incarceration, and Nancy Garrido continued to hold Jaycee prisoner. According to one source, she has said she "tried" to free her, but, unable to uncover any details, I frankly doubt that actually occurred. How difficult would it have been to open the door and say, "Go home?"
I doubt that she tried because, by that time, she was already in over her own head. To free the girl would have meant admitting that fact to her husband, whom she probably greatly feared, and most likely, bringing the police down upon herself, resulting in a certain prison sentence. No, I don't think Mrs. Garrido would have had the courage to "do the right thing."
I cannot at this time, though, call Nancy Garrido a monster, because I believe she may have been a victim of her husband, herself. I've even wondered if her husband may have promised her something she may have desired more than anything else on Earth: children. Maybe she was unable to conceive, and, with her husband a sex offender, knew she would never have the opportunity to adopt. Maybe he convinced her to go along with his diabolical plan by telling her she would finally get the babies she so deserved. I don't know.
I'm not trying to excuse her behavior at all, but we all react to fear and intimidation differently, and certainly she was afraid...of her husband...of retribution...of the unknown. As I said, I haven't enough information as yet to label her a monster, and although I certainly feel she deserves punishment, I cannot feel rage for the woman who may or may not be a victim of Garrido's warped sense of...everything.
But I can feel rage at the first inklings I've seen of exploitation of Jaycee's situation.
I saw the first on the National Enquirer. No, I do not subscribe and I do not browse through it at the newsstand. I saw it at work when bundles of the dubious news magazine came through the mail. ENQUIRER EXCLUSIVE - JAYCEE SUICIDE SHOCKER, the headline read. There were also stories about Oprah in some sort of crisis, President Obama's gay lover, and the "truth about Dolly Parton's chin" - all the sort of nonsense we're accustomed to seeing on the Enquirer covers - but this story about Jaycee immediately enraged me.
Jaycee is 29 years old. She lived most of her life in captivity, enduring repeated rapes, childbirths when she, herself, was merely a child, and primitive living conditions. She was forced to live a lie to her own children, instilling in them the belief that their monster father was kind and loving, that she was their older sister, and that the monster's wife was actually their mother. These are the few details of Jaycee's last eighteen years that we know; there are many other horrors which have been speculated upon, there will be many more to come to light, and there will be some that are forever kept locked away in the minds of only those involved.
She's been through enough! For God's sake, leave her alone! Leave her alone!
ONLY for research for this post did I access the Enquirer article online. Never once did I believe the headline, and my instincts were correct: Jaycee has not knowingly attempted suicide. There is no suicide shocker. The entire gist of the article is that poor Jaycee has been through so much, it is not unreasonable to accept that she may, MAY, be headed down a rough road, a road that includes depression, alcohol and/or drug abuse, thoughts of suicide, and perhaps even suicide attempts.
Well, DUH!
Common sense and a modicum of empathy tells any reasonable person that of course, these routes are possible. They're possible for any human being upon the face of this Earth; why in the world should we expect that Jaycee, with all she's endured, would be immune from such possibilities?
To drive their point home, and increase the dramatic effect, the Enquirer quotes three accredited individuals, each of whom have essentially the same reasonable opinion; I suppose, though, the more high-falutin' names the Enquirer can throw out there, the more authentic and grandiose the article appears. It even sounds, upon a quick read, as if these persons are personally involved in Jaycee's case; as if they are treating her. Not so. Point number one: Jaycee's personal treating physicians would not be allowed to divulge information about their patient; and point number two: IF they did divulge information, why in the world would they relay that information to a sleazy rag like the National Enquirer?
I actually did a bit of research on each of the quoted doctors and found their listed accreditations true: Dr. Naftali Berrill, executive director of the New York Center for Neuropsychology and Forensic Behavioral Science; Dr. Katherine van Wormer, professor of social work at the University of Northern Iowa; and Dr. Cara Gardenswartz, UCLA lecturer in abnormal psychology. After each quote by these persons, it is stated explicitly that they "told the Enquirer." WHY? Why would these highly accredited professionals tell the National Enquirer anything other than, "Get lost?"
I have no idea. Maybe they didn't know they were speaking to an Enquirer employee. Maybe said employee also works for a more responsible media outlet, and presented himself as a representative of such. I know if I worked for both the Enquirer and, say, The New York Times, I'd list the Times as my employer at every opportunity. Maybe these accredited individuals were duped into giving out information.
But if they gave this information knowingly and willingly, I say, shame on them. Shame on them for exploiting Jaycee's situation. Shame on the Enquirer. And shame on one Mr. Shane Ryan, the second exploiter of whom I've heard tale.
A producer of adult films, Mr. Ryan is planning a movie about Jaycee, reportedly entitled, "Abducted: An American Sex Slave -- The Jaycee Dugard Story." He also acts in some of his films, with titles such as, "It's My Turn Bitch!," "Warning!! Pedophile Released: A Love Story" and "Amateur Porn Star Killer." He has said publicly that he doesn't intend the movie to be exploitative and that it would focus on the relationship between Jaycee and Phillip Garrido.
Not exploitative? Oh, come now, Mr. Ryan.
And the sad fact is, this would probably be a huge financial success. People are curious about this most celebrated story; as the Enquirer says, "Inquiring minds want to know."
Shame on you, Mr. Ryan.

Jaycee and her family are, understandably, in seclusion, reconnecting, trying to repair the damage. They give bits of information to valid news sources, and Jaycee and her daughters most graciously permitted People Magazine a story and current photos. The pictures reveal a healthy looking, beautiful young woman, smiling, laughing with her mother and younger sister. The story often quotes a spokesperson for the family, who gives brief, non-invasive accounts of the family's routines, therapy, and readjustment to each other and the world. She acknowledges that the road ahead will be long, but for now, Jaycee and her two daughters, Starlit, age 11, and Angel, 15, are happy, healthy, intelligent, and seemingly adjusting well.
And the feature ends with a most poignant photo, a photo of Jaycee, her arms about her two daughters, looking toward a fence, deep woods beyond. But the photo was shot from behind the three ladies: Jaycee, the term "mother" new to her, showed her protective instincts and didn't want her daughter's faces shown to the world just yet. That photo brought tears to my eyes. It seemed to quietly say, "Here we are. We're happy, and we're free, and together we'll face whatever lies beyond the barriers ahead. But, please, please, give us our privacy for now. Just for now, let us be."
I hope everybody listens to that photo. Please, leave Jaycee alone. Please, just let her be.




a.jpg)





































